The space between

Great debate last night. A really illuminating discussion which, intentionally or not, showed that there are many shared issues of concern across the parties including maternity/paternity leave; rape and violence against women; equal pay and the difference that more women in politics would bring to the debate.

Last night also starkly highlighted the often very great differences in the favoured means to achieve these ends.
Would the use of all-women shortlists across all political parties or the introduction of proportional representation be more effective in increasing the numbers of women in parliament?
Just how should parental leave be apportioned between the mother and the father and who should pay for it?
Two-thirds of those earning minimum wage are women, what is the best way to lift them out of poverty?

There was also a really interesting discussion about the images and practices that young women and men are exposed to in their everyday lives, from lads mages to lap dancing clubs, and how this impacts on their view of themselves and of women. Should page 3 be banned was the question. And interestingly enough the Home Office today has published this report looking at just that question.

We also strayed onto the difference in style of politics between men and women. Would a new, round chamber lead to a more consensual style of politics, more attractive to women than the hurly burly nature of the chamber at the moment?

What do you think? If you have any thoughts please do share them in the comments or join the debate on Facebook, ‘Progressive Women’ and follow us on Twitter @sylviapankhurst.

Our thanks to Natalie Bennett, Green Party PPC for Holborn and St Pancras, to Roberta Blackman-Woods, Labour MP for the City of Durham, Mary MacLeod, Conservative Party PPC for Brentford and Isleworth and Baroness Walmsely, Liberal Democrat Spokesperson in the House of Lords.

And our particular thanks to everyone who asked a question and took part in the discussion.